Re: [PATCH v11 05/23] cxl: Move CXL driver RCH error handling into CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS conditional block

[Bowman, Terry]

On 8/28/2025 3:57 AM, Alejandro Lucero Palau wrote:
> On 8/27/25 02:35, Terry Bowman wrote:
>> Restricted CXL Host (RCH) protocol error handling uses a procedure distinct
>> from the CXL Virtual Hierarchy (VH) handling. This is because of the
>> differences in the RCH and VH topologies. Improve the maintainability and
>> add ability to enable/disable RCH handling.
>>
>> Move and combine the RCH handling code into a single block conditionally
>> compiled with the CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS kernel config.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> ---
>> v10->v11:
>> - New patch
>> ---
>>   drivers/cxl/core/ras.c | 175 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>>   1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
>> index 0875ce8116ff..f42f9a255ef8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
>> @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ void cxl_ras_exit(void)
>>   	cancel_work_sync(&cxl_cper_prot_err_work);
>>   }
>>   
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS
>
> You are introducing CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS in the next patch. Is it correct 
> to use it here?
>

You are correct. I need to move the introduction of Kconfig's CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS definition into this patch. Thanks. Terry