Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: fix typo in documentation Correct a typo in the documentation by replacing "abd" with the correct word "and". This improves readability and avoids confusion in the description.
From: Nick Huang
Date: Sun Sep 07 2025 - 19:43:22 EST
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> 於 2025年9月7日 週日 下午11:07寫道:
>
> On 07/09/2025 15:38, Nick Huang wrote:
> > Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> 於 2025年9月3日 週三 下午3:42寫道:
> >>
> >> Looks like you corrupted the subject line with the commit message.
> >>
> >> Please resubmit.
> >>
> >>> From: Johnson Huang <kusogame68@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Use `git format-patch` and `git send-email` instead.
> >>
> >>> Co-developed-by: Nick Huang <sef1548@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Nick Huang <sef1548@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Johnson Huang <kusogame68@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> It took two of you to correct the word "and"?
> >>
> >>> ---
> >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71847-pmic.yaml | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71847-pmic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71847-pmic.yaml
> >>> index d783cc4e4e..d16c82e398 100644
> >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71847-pmic.yaml
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71847-pmic.yaml
> >>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ properties:
> >>> clock-output-names:
> >>> maxItems: 1
> >>>
> >>> -# The BD71847 abd BD71850 support two different HW states as reset target
> >>> +# The BD71847 and BD71850 support two different HW states as reset target
> >>> # states. States are called as SNVS and READY. At READY state all the PMIC
> >>> # power outputs go down and OTP is reload. At the SNVS state all other logic
> >>> # and external devices apart from the SNVS power domain are shut off. Please
> >>> --
> >>> 2.43.0
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Lee Jones [李琼斯]
> >
> >
> > This patch was sent by Johnson Huang on my behalf.
>
> The From is malformed then. There is no single reason to change it.
>
> > If only one person should sign off, I have already discussed with him
> > and will keep only my own Signed-off-by.
>
> For simple one letter typo? And then you sent three patches one-per-fix,
> which is way too much churn.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Currently, I sent one patch per file for fixing a single typo.
In the next version, I will combine all the typo fixes into a single
patch and resend it. Is that acceptable?
Best regards,
Nick Huang