Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] iio: adc: Add the NXP SAR ADC support for the s32g2/3 platforms

[Christophe JAILLET]

Le 16/09/2025 à 22:26, Daniel Lezcano a écrit :
> From: Stefan-Gabriel Mirea <stefan-gabriel.mirea@xxxxxxx>
>
> The NXP S32G2 and S32G3 platforms integrate a successive approximation
> register (SAR) ADC. Two instances are available, each providing 8
> multiplexed input channels with 12-bit resolution. The conversion rate
> is up to 1 Msps depending on the configuration and sampling window.
>
> The SAR ADC supports raw, buffer, and trigger modes. It can operate
> in both single-shot and continuous conversion modes, with optional
> hardware triggering through the cross-trigger unit (CTU) or external
> events. An internal prescaler allows adjusting the sampling clock,
> while per-channel programmable sampling times provide fine-grained
> trade-offs between accuracy and latency. Automatic calibration is
> performed at probe time to minimize offset and gain errors.
>
> The driver is derived from the BSP implementation and has been partly
> rewritten to comply with upstream requirements. For this reason, all
> contributors are listed as co-developers, while the author refers to
> the initial BSP driver file creator.
>
> All modes have been validated on the S32G274-RDB2 platform using an
> externally generated square wave captured by the ADC. Tests covered
> buffered streaming via IIO, trigger synchronization, and accuracy
> verification against a precision laboratory signal source.
>
> Co-developed-by: Alexandru-Catalin Ionita <alexandru-catalin.ionita@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru-Catalin Ionita <alexandru-catalin.ionita@xxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Ciprian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ciprian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@xxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Radu Pirea (NXP OSS) <radu-nicolae.pirea@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Radu Pirea (NXP OSS) <radu-nicolae.pirea@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan-Gabriel Mirea <stefan-gabriel.mirea@xxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Hi,

> +static void nxp_sar_adc_dma_remove(void *data)
> +{
> +	struct nxp_sar_adc *info = data;
> +
> +	dma_free_coherent(info->dma_chan->device->dev, NXP_SAR_ADC_DMA_BUFF_SZ,
> +			  info->dma_buf.buf, info->rx_dma_buf);
> +}
> +
> +static int nxp_sar_adc_dma_probe(struct device *dev, struct nxp_sar_adc *info)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev_dma;
> +	u8 *rx_buf;
> +
> +	info->dma_chan = devm_dma_request_chan(dev, "rx");
> +	if (IS_ERR(info->dma_chan))
> +		return PTR_ERR(info->dma_chan);
> +
> +	dev_dma = info->dma_chan->device->dev;
> +	rx_buf = dma_alloc_coherent(dev_dma, NXP_SAR_ADC_DMA_BUFF_SZ,
> +				    &info->rx_dma_buf, GFP_KERNEL);

maybe dmam_alloc_coherent() for the managed version?
This would save some LoC.

> +	if (!rx_buf)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	info->dma_buf.buf = rx_buf;
> +
> +	return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, nxp_sar_adc_dma_remove, info);
> +}