Re: [PATCH v6 00/22] Python generated Intel metrics

[Ian Rogers]

On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 8:31 AM Falcon, Thomas <thomas.falcon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2025-09-03 at 21:46 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > Generate twenty sets of additional metrics for Intel. Rapl and Idle
> > metrics aren't specific to Intel but are placed here for ease and
> > convenience. Smi and tsx metrics are added so they can be dropped from
> > the per model json files. There are four uncore sets of metrics and
> > eleven core metrics. Add a CheckPmu function to metric to simplify
> > detecting the presence of hybrid PMUs in events. Metrics with
> > experimental events are flagged as experimental in their description.
> >
> > The patches should be applied on top of:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250829033138.4166591-1-irogers@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Tested on Alder Lake, Arrow Lake, and Sapphire Rapids.
>
> Tested-by: Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks Thomas! I'll repost with the missed signed-off-by tag.

This series links to the AMD series
(https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250829033138.4166591-1-irogers@xxxxxxxxxx/).
I'll not apply your tested-by tag to that given those models weren't
tested.
The AMD series links to the foundation patches
(https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250829030727.4159703-1-irogers@xxxxxxxxxx/)
and so I'd like to add your tag there.
The foundation series links to the patches changing how legacy
hardware events are handled, moving the handling to json
(https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250828205930.4007284-1-irogers@xxxxxxxxxx/).
The dependency there is just because those patches also generate json
events in the Makefile using python, the main theme of the patches I
think it outside of your testing here, so I'll not apply your
tested-by tag to those patches.

Thanks again,
Ian