Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rust: clk: implement Send and Sync

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Daniel Almeida (2025-09-10 11:47:30)
> Hi Boqun,
> 
> > On 10 Sep 2025, at 14:49, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 02:28:27PM -0300, Daniel Almeida wrote:
> >> From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> 
> >> These traits are required for drivers to embed the Clk type in their own
> >> data structures because driver data structures are usually required to
> >> be Send. See e.g. [1] for the kind of workaround that drivers currently
> >> need due to lacking this annotation.
> >> 
> >> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250812-tyr-v2-1-9e0f3dc9da95@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [1]
> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Reviewed-by: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > This tag list looks a bit weird to me. Why is there a SoB from you
> > before Alice's SoB? At least for the usage I'm familiar with, outside
> > the case of Co-developed-bys, multiple SoBs is used for recording how
> > the patches are routed. For example, if I have a patch that has my SoB
> > and I send it to you, you queue in your tree and then send out to other
> > maintainers for merging, in general you would put your SoB after mine in
> > that case. But I don't think that's case here? Alice's patch has only
> > her SoB:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250904-clk-send-sync-v1-1-48d023320eb8@xxxxxxxxxx/
> > 
> > What's the intention of the SoB tag here?
> > 
> > Otherwise the patch looks good to me. If we get the tag list resolved,
> > feel free to add:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Boqun
> > 
> 
> You have to include your SOB when submitting patches from others.
> 
> This is something I tend to forget often, so I made sure it was there. The
> order may be indeed off though.

Yes the order is wrong. The first SoB should be the commit author.