Re: [PATCH v15 29/41] KVM: SEV: Synchronize MSR_IA32_XSS from the GHCB when it's valid

[Tom Lendacky]

On 9/18/25 17:18, John Allen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 09:42:21PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
>> On Thu, 2025-09-18 at 16:23 -0500, John Allen wrote:
>>> The 32bit selftest still doesn't work properly with sev-es, but that was
>>> a problem with the previous version too. I suspect there's some
>>> incompatibility between sev-es and the test, but I haven't been able to
>>> get a good answer on why that might be.
>>
>> You are talking about test_32bit() in test_shadow_stack.c?
> 
> Yes, that's right.
> 
>>
>> That test relies on a specific CET arch behavior. If you try to transition to a
>> 32 bit compatibility mode segment with an SSP with high bits set (outside the 32
>> bit address space), a #GP will be triggered by the HW. The test verifies that
>> this happens and the kernel handles it appropriately. Could it be platform/mode
>> difference and not KVM issue?
> 
> I'm fairly certain that this is an issue with any sev-es guest. The
> unexpected seg fault happens when we isolate the sigaction32 call used
> in the test regardless of shadow stack support. So I wonder if it's
> something similar to the case that the test is checking for. Maybe
> something to do with the C bit.

Likely something to do with the encryption bit since, if set, will
generate an invalid address in 32-bit, right?

For SEV-ES, we transition to 64-bit very quickly because of the use of the
encryption bit, which is why, for example, we don't support SEV-ES /
SEV-SNP in the OvmfIa32X64.dsc package.

Thanks,
Tom

> 
> Thanks,
> John