Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] spi: spi-offload-trigger-pwm: Use duty offset

[David Lechner]

On 9/18/25 12:34 PM, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
> From: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Pass the duty offset to the waveform pwm.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-offload-trigger-pwm.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-offload-trigger-pwm.c b/drivers/spi/spi-offload-trigger-pwm.c
> index 805ed41560df..3e8c19227edb 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-offload-trigger-pwm.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-offload-trigger-pwm.c
> @@ -51,12 +51,14 @@ static int spi_offload_trigger_pwm_validate(struct spi_offload_trigger *trigger,
>  	wf.period_length_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC, periodic->frequency_hz);
>  	/* REVISIT: 50% duty-cycle for now - may add config parameter later */
>  	wf.duty_length_ns = wf.period_length_ns / 2;
> +	wf.duty_offset_ns = periodic->offset_ns;
>  
>  	ret = pwm_round_waveform_might_sleep(st->pwm, &wf);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	periodic->frequency_hz = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC, wf.period_length_ns);
> +	periodic->offset_ns = wf.duty_offset_ns;
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -77,6 +79,7 @@ static int spi_offload_trigger_pwm_enable(struct spi_offload_trigger *trigger,
>  	wf.period_length_ns = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC, periodic->frequency_hz);
>  	/* REVISIT: 50% duty-cycle for now - may add config parameter later */
>  	wf.duty_length_ns = wf.period_length_ns / 2;
> +	wf.duty_offset_ns = periodic->offset_ns;
>  
>  	return pwm_set_waveform_might_sleep(st->pwm, &wf, false);
>  }

Does this really need to be a separate patch from the one
that adds the field?