Re: [PATCH cgroup/for-next 1/2] cpuset: fix failure to enable isolated partition when containing isolcpus
From: Waiman Long
Date: Thu Sep 18 2025 - 14:03:01 EST
On 9/18/25 8:25 AM, Chen Ridong wrote:
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@xxxxxxxxxx>
The 'isolcpus' parameter specified at boot time can be assigned to an
isolated partition. While it is valid put the 'isolcpus' in an isolated
partition, attempting to change a member cpuset to an isolated partition
will fail if the cpuset contains any 'isolcpus'.
For example, the system boots with 'isolcpus=9', and the following
configuration works correctly:
# cd /sys/fs/cgroup/
# mkdir test
# echo 1 > test/cpuset.cpus
# echo isolated > test/cpuset.cpus.partition
# cat test/cpuset.cpus.partition
isolated
# echo 9 > test/cpuset.cpus
# cat test/cpuset.cpus.partition
isolated
# cat test/cpuset.cpus
9
However, the following steps to convert a member cpuset to an isolated
partition will fail:
# cd /sys/fs/cgroup/
# mkdir test
# echo 9 > test/cpuset.cpus
# echo isolated > test/cpuset.cpus.partition
# cat test/cpuset.cpus.partition
isolated invalid (partition config conflicts with housekeeping setup)
The issue occurs because the new partition state (new_prs) is used for
validation against housekeeping constraints before it has been properly
updated. To resolve this, move the assignment of new_prs before the
housekeeping validation check when enabling a root partition.
Fixes: 11e5f407b64a ("cgroup/cpuset: Keep track of CPUs in isolated partitions")
Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for finding the bug. However, I think the commit to be fixed should be 4a74e418881f ("cgroup/cpuset: Check partition conflict with housekeeping setup"), not the one you listed above.
Cheers,
Longman
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 44231cb1d83f..2b7e2f17577e 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -1806,6 +1806,7 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
xcpus = tmp->delmask;
if (compute_excpus(cs, xcpus))
WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_empty(cs->exclusive_cpus));
+ new_prs = (cmd == partcmd_enable) ? PRS_ROOT : PRS_ISOLATED;
/*
* Enabling partition root is not allowed if its
@@ -1838,7 +1839,6 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
deleting = true;
subparts_delta++;
- new_prs = (cmd == partcmd_enable) ? PRS_ROOT : PRS_ISOLATED;
} else if (cmd == partcmd_disable) {
/*
* May need to add cpus back to parent's effective_cpus