RE: [PATCH V7 2/4] asm-generic/io.h: Add big-endian MMIO accessors
From: Guntupalli, Manikanta
Date: Wed Sep 24 2025 - 04:59:52 EST
[Public]
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2025 12:08 AM
> To: Guntupalli, Manikanta <manikanta.guntupalli@xxxxxxx>; git (AMD-Xilinx)
> <git@xxxxxxx>; Simek, Michal <michal.simek@xxxxxxx>; Alexandre Belloni
> <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>; Rob Herring
> <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>; krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Przemysław Gaj <pgaj@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-
> engineering.com>; tommaso.merciai.xr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> quic_msavaliy@xxxxxxxxxxx; S-k, Shyam-sundar <Shyam-sundar.S-k@xxxxxxx>;
> Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'billy_tsai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> <billy_tsai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Kees Cook <kees@xxxxxxxxxx>; Gustavo A. R. Silva
> <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jorge
> Marques <jorge.marques@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-i3c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Linux-Arch <linux-
> arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Pandey, Radhey Shyam <radhey.shyam.pandey@xxxxxxx>; Goud, Srinivas
> <srinivas.goud@xxxxxxx>; Datta, Shubhrajyoti <shubhrajyoti.datta@xxxxxxx>;
> manion05gk@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/4] asm-generic/io.h: Add big-endian MMIO accessors
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2025, at 17:45, Manikanta Guntupalli wrote:
> > Add MMIO accessors to support big-endian memory operations. These
> > helpers include {read, write}{w, l, q}_be() and {read, write}s{w, l,
> > q}_be(), which allows to access big-endian memory regions while
> > returning the results in the CPU’s native endianness.
> >
> > This provides a consistent interface to interact with hardware using
> > big-endian register layouts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manikanta Guntupalli <manikanta.guntupalli@xxxxxxx>
>
> I feel like we already have too many accessor functions like these, what's wrong with
> just using io{read,write}{8,16,32,64}be() in your driver?
>
> On most architectures (including arm, riscv, powerpc and microblaze, but not x86),
> the ioread/write helpers are identical to the readl/writel style helpers, the only
> difference being that on x86 they add an extra indirection for the port I/O check.
>
> At the moment, there are only six drivers that use the
> io{read,write}{8,16,32,64}be() style helpers. They are all powerpc specific and can
> probably be changed to io{read,write}be.
The existing helpers io{read,write}{8,16,32,64}be() internally rely on {read,write}{b,w,l,q}().
From both description and implementation, {read,write}{b,w,l,q}() access little-endian memory and return the result in native endianness:
/*
* {read,write}{b,w,l,q}() access little endian memory
* and return result in native endianness.
*/
static inline u32 readl(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
{
u32 val;
log_read_mmio(32, addr, _THIS_IP_, _RET_IP_);
__io_br();
val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(addr));
__io_ar(val);
log_post_read_mmio(val, 32, addr, _THIS_IP_, _RET_IP_);
return val;
}
The io{read,write}*be() helpers then perform a byte swap, e.g.:
static inline u32 ioread32be(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
{
return swab32(readl(addr));
}
This works on little-endian CPUs, but on big-endian CPUs the {read,write}{b,w,l,q}() helpers already return data in big-endian format. The extra byte swap in io{read,write}*be() therefore corrupts the data, producing little-endian values when big-endian is expected.
The newly introduced {read,write}{w,l,q}_be() helpers directly access big-endian IO memory and return results in native endianness, avoiding this mismatch.
Thanks,
Manikanta.