Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/17] objtool: Function validation tracing

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Sep 24 2025 - 06:44:35 EST

Next message: Konrad Dybcio: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: Rework X1-based Asus Zenbook A14's displays"
Previous message: R, Ramu: "RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next 2/5] idpf: add XSk pool initialization"
In reply to: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/17] objtool: Function validation tracing"
Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/17] objtool: Function validation tracing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 09:42:06AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > > d051: perf_get_x86_pmu_capability+0x51 | xchg %ax,%ax

That libopcode is 'funny', isn't that typically spelled "nop" ?

Next message: Konrad Dybcio: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: Rework X1-based Asus Zenbook A14's displays"
Previous message: R, Ramu: "RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next 2/5] idpf: add XSk pool initialization"
In reply to: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/17] objtool: Function validation tracing"
Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/17] objtool: Function validation tracing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]