Re: Missing signoff in the ksmbd tree

From: Steve French
Date: Thu Sep 25 2025 - 11:42:33 EST

Next message: Paolo Abeni: "Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net/smc: handle -ENOMEM from smc_wr_alloc_link_mem gracefully"
Previous message: Dave Hansen: "Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: Replace kmalloc() + copy_from_user() with memdup_user()"
In reply to: Mark Brown: "Missing signoff in the ksmbd tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Metze fixed the missing signoff and I have updated the ksmbd-for-next
branch (also now has fewer patches, and some he has reordered to be
less confusing)

On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 5:55 AM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Commit
>
> d76f0acc84fa7 ("smb: server: make use of ib_alloc_cq_any() instead of ib_alloc_cq()")
>
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.

--
Thanks,

Steve

Next message: Paolo Abeni: "Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net/smc: handle -ENOMEM from smc_wr_alloc_link_mem gracefully"
Previous message: Dave Hansen: "Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: Replace kmalloc() + copy_from_user() with memdup_user()"
In reply to: Mark Brown: "Missing signoff in the ksmbd tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]