Re: [syzbot] [mm?] WARNING in memory_failure

From: jane . chu

Date: Mon Sep 29 2025 - 13:50:27 EST



On 9/29/2025 10:29 AM, jane.chu@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On 9/29/2025 4:08 AM, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:

I want to change all the split functions in huge_mm.h and provide
mapping_min_folio_order() to try_folio_split() in truncate_inode_partial_folio().

Something like below:

1. no split function will change the given order;
2. __folio_split() will no longer give VM_WARN_ONCE when provided new_order
is smaller than mapping_min_folio_order().

In this way, for an LBS folio that cannot be split to order 0, split
functions will return -EINVAL to tell caller that the folio cannot
be split. The caller is supposed to handle the split failure.

IIUC, we will remove warn on once but just return -EINVAL in __folio_split()
function if new_order < min_order like this:
...
        min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(folio->mapping);
        if (new_order < min_order) {
-            VM_WARN_ONCE(1, "Cannot split mapped folio below min- order: %u",
-                     min_order);
            ret = -EINVAL;
            goto out;
        }
...

Then the user process will get a SIGBUS indicting the entire huge page at higher order -
                folio_set_has_hwpoisoned(folio);
                if (try_to_split_thp_page(p, false) < 0) {
                        res = -EHWPOISON;
                        kill_procs_now(p, pfn, flags, folio);
                        put_page(p);
                        action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_UNSPLIT_THP, MF_FAILED);
                        goto unlock_mutex;
                }
                VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!page_count(p), p);
                folio = page_folio(p);

the huge page is not usable any way, kind of similar to the hugetlb page situation: since the page cannot be splitted, the entire page is marked unusable.

How about keep the current huge page split code as is, but change the M- F code to recognize that in a successful splitting case, the poisoned page might just be in a lower folio order, and thus, deliver the SIGBUS ?

diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index a24806bb8e82..342c81edcdd9 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -2291,7 +2291,9 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
                 * page is a valid handlable page.
                 */
                folio_set_has_hwpoisoned(folio);
-               if (try_to_split_thp_page(p, false) < 0) {
+               ret = try_to_split_thp_page(p, false);
+               folio = page_folio(p);
+               if (ret < 0 || folio_test_large(folio)) {
                        res = -EHWPOISON;
                        kill_procs_now(p, pfn, flags, folio);
                        put_page(p);
@@ -2299,7 +2301,6 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
                        goto unlock_mutex;
                }
                VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!page_count(p), p);
-               folio = page_folio(p);
        }

thanks,
-jane

Maybe this is better, in case there are other reason for split_huge_page() to return -EINVAL.

diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index a24806bb8e82..2bfa05acae65 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -1659,9 +1659,10 @@ static int identify_page_state(unsigned long pfn, struct page *p,
static int try_to_split_thp_page(struct page *page, bool release)
{
int ret;
+ int new_order = min_order_for_split(page_folio(page));

lock_page(page);
- ret = split_huge_page(page);
+ ret = split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(page, NULL, new_order);
unlock_page(page);

if (ret && release)
@@ -2277,6 +2278,7 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
folio_unlock(folio);

if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
+ int ret;
/*
* The flag must be set after the refcount is bumped
* otherwise it may race with THP split.
@@ -2291,7 +2293,9 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
* page is a valid handlable page.
*/
folio_set_has_hwpoisoned(folio);
- if (try_to_split_thp_page(p, false) < 0) {
+ ret = try_to_split_thp_page(p, false);
+ folio = page_folio(p);
+ if (ret < 0 || folio_test_large(folio)) {
res = -EHWPOISON;
kill_procs_now(p, pfn, flags, folio);
put_page(p);
@@ -2299,7 +2303,6 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
goto unlock_mutex;
}
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!page_count(p), p);
- folio = page_folio(p);
}

/*
@@ -2618,7 +2621,8 @@ static int soft_offline_in_use_page(struct page *page)
};

if (!huge && folio_test_large(folio)) {
- if (try_to_split_thp_page(page, true)) {
+ if ((try_to_split_thp_page(page, true)) ||
+ folio_test_large(page_folio(page))) {
pr_info("%#lx: thp split failed\n", pfn);
return -EBUSY;
}


thanks,
-jane