Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] cpufreq: Fixes and cleanups related to CPUFREQ_ETERNAL

[Viresh Kumar]

On 25-09-25, 17:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> The first patch in this series is meant to address the failure discussed in
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20250922125929.453444-1-shawnguo2@xxxxxxxx/
> 
> but in a different way than proposed by Shawn.
> 
> The second one is a CPPC cpufreq driver fix preventing it from using an
> overly large transition delay in the cases when that delay cannot be
> obtained from the platform firmware.
> 
> Patch [3/4] makes CPPC use a specific symbol instead of CPUFREQ_ETERNAL for
> signaling error conditions while attempting to retrieve a transition latency
> value from the platform firmware.
> 
> The last patch removes CPUFREQ_ETERNAL (which has no users any more) from
> cpufreq, including all references to it in cpufreq documentation.

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
viresh