Re: [PATCH v2 08/12] nova-core: sequencer: Add register opcodes
From: Timur Tabi
Date: Wed Nov 05 2025 - 18:19:18 EST
On Wed, 2025-11-05 at 13:55 -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
> > #define nvdev_trace(d,f,a...) nvdev_printk((d), TRACE, info, f, ##a)
> > #define nvdev_spam(d,f,a...) nvdev_printk((d), SPAM, dbg, f, ##a)
>
> ...and those are unusable, unfortunately. I've tried.
This works great for me:
modprobe nouveau dyndbg="+p" modeset=1 debug="gsp=spam" config=NvGspRm=1
I get all sequencer messages when I boot with these options.
> ftrace/bpftrace, maybe those are the real way to "trace"...or something
> other than this.
You could say the same thing about most dev_dbg() statements.
I agree that dev_dbg for sequencer commands is excessive, and that implementing new debug levels
just to get sequencer prints is also excessive. But Nouveau implement nvkm_trace for a reason. And
we all know that because of ? in Rust, NovaCore does a terrible job at telling us where an error
actually occurred. So there is a lot of room for improvement.