Re: [PATCH 1/3] Corrected errno in minix_new_inode

[Jori Koolstra]

> 
> OK, but this will make the compiler likely unhappy (because it doesn't know
> s_imap_blocks cannot be 0) and generally the code will be less
> self-containted. So in the spirit of defensive programming I'd leave the
> assignment there.
> 

OK, I see. I agree. Still should it then not be set where j is declared? But
that is a very minor point. I am okay with removing that change.

PS. Sorry, I forgot to send-all. My apologies for the double emails.