Re: [PATCH] Removed unused variable
From: Jeff Layton
Date: Wed Dec 10 2025 - 18:12:10 EST
A more descriptive title is preferred: "Remove unused variable from
nfs4_ff_alloc_deviceid_node()"
On Wed, 2025-12-10 at 21:59 +0100, Pycode wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Pycode <pycode42@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Removed the unused variable ret in
> fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
>
> (Disclaimer this is my first patch, be sorry if I have done anything
> wrong!)
> ---
> fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
> index c55ea8fa3bfa..9cd04e85d52f 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayoutdev.c
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ nfs4_ff_alloc_deviceid_node(struct nfs_server *server, struct pnfs_device *pdev,
> u32 mp_count;
> u32 version_count;
> __be32 *p;
> - int i, ret = -ENOMEM;
> + int i = -ENOMEM;
>
No need to initialize this.
> /* set up xdr stream */
> scratch = folio_alloc(gfp_flags, 0);
> @@ -88,7 +88,6 @@ nfs4_ff_alloc_deviceid_node(struct nfs_server *server, struct pnfs_device *pdev,
> if (list_empty(&dsaddrs)) {
> dprintk("%s: no suitable DS addresses found\n",
> __func__);
> - ret = -ENOMEDIUM;
> goto out_err_drain_dsaddrs;
> }
>
> @@ -134,7 +133,6 @@ nfs4_ff_alloc_deviceid_node(struct nfs_server *server, struct pnfs_device *pdev,
> dprintk("%s: [%d] unsupported ds version %d-%d\n", __func__,
> i, ds_versions[i].version,
> ds_versions[i].minor_version);
> - ret = -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
> goto out_err_drain_dsaddrs;
> }
>
What about the dprintk() at the bottom of this function? Does this
actually build?
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>