Re: [PATCH 3/3] scripts: generate_rust_analyzer: Add pin_init_internal deps

From: Miguel Ojeda

Date: Wed Jan 14 2026 - 05:29:43 EST


On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 10:26 AM Jesung Yang <y.j3ms.n@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The recent `syn` rewrite of pin-init [1] covers this as well. How do we
> usually handle this kind of overlap?
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20260111122554.2662175-4-lossin@xxxxxxxxxx/

It should be fine, when applying that other series later on we will
get a conflict to be resolved, but that's it.

I wonder, though -- should these be applied as fixes? After all, even
the commit hash is provided there, so we could add a Fixes too. They
could also be backported if needed.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel