Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] uaccess: Add copy_from_user_nul helper

From: Yury Norov

Date: Tue Jan 13 2026 - 13:00:36 EST


On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 03:30:34PM +0800, Fushuai Wang wrote:
> From: Fushuai Wang <wangfushuai@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Many places call copy_from_user() to copy a buffer from user space,
> and then manually add a NULL terminator to the destination buffer,
> e.g.:

6 is not many

>
> if (copy_from_user(dest, src, len))
> return -EFAULT;
> dest[len] = '\0';
>
> This is repetitive and error-prone. Add a copy_from_user_nul() helper to
> simplify such patterns. It copied n bytes from user space to kernel space,
> and NUL-terminates the destination buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fushuai Wang <wangfushuai@xxxxxxxxx>

I checked the cases you've found, and all them clearly abuse
copy_from_user(). For example, #2 in tlbflush_write_file():

if (copy_from_user(buf, user_buf, len))
return -EFAULT;

buf[len] = '\0';
if (kstrtoint(buf, 0, &ceiling))
return -EINVAL;

should be:

len = strncpy_from_user(buf, user_buf, len);
if (len < 0)
return len;

ret = kstrtoint(buf, 0, &ceiling);
if (ret)
return ret;

See, if you use the right API, you don't need this weird
copy_from_user_nul(). Also notice how nice the original version hides
possible ERANGE in kstrtoint().

Patches #3-5 in the series again copy strings with raw non-string API,
so should be converted to some flavor of strcpy().

#6 patches lib/kstrtox, which makes little sense because the whole
purpose of that library is to handle raw pieces of memory as valid
C strings. One would expect such patterns in library code, and I'd
prefer having them explicit.

I find copy_{from,to}_user_nul() useful for objects that must be
null-terminated, and may have \0 somewhere in the middle. Those are
not C strings. I suspect this isn't a popular format across the kernel.

On the other hand, adding the _nul() version of copy_from_user() would
make an API abuse like above simpler, which is a bad thing.

Can you drop copy_from_user_nul() and submit a series that switches
string manipulations to the dedicated string functions?

Thanks,
Yury