Re: [PATCH v4 10/22] slab: add optimized sheaf refill from partial list
From: Harry Yoo
Date: Thu Jan 29 2026 - 02:44:17 EST
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 03:12:03PM +0800, Hao Li wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 07:52:48AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > At this point we have sheaves enabled for all caches, but their refill
> > is done via __kmem_cache_alloc_bulk() which relies on cpu (partial)
> > slabs - now a redundant caching layer that we are about to remove.
> >
> > The refill will thus be done from slabs on the node partial list.
> > Introduce new functions that can do that in an optimized way as it's
> > easier than modifying the __kmem_cache_alloc_bulk() call chain.
> >
> > Introduce struct partial_bulk_context, a variant of struct
> > partial_context that can return a list of slabs from the partial list
> > with the sum of free objects in them within the requested min and max.
> >
> > Introduce get_partial_node_bulk() that removes the slabs from freelist
> > and returns them in the list. There is a racy read of slab->counters
> > so make sure the non-atomic write in __update_freelist_slow() is not
> > tearing.
> >
> > Introduce get_freelist_nofreeze() which grabs the freelist without
> > freezing the slab.
> >
> > Introduce alloc_from_new_slab() which can allocate multiple objects from
> > a newly allocated slab where we don't need to synchronize with freeing.
> > In some aspects it's similar to alloc_single_from_new_slab() but assumes
> > the cache is a non-debug one so it can avoid some actions. It supports
> > the allow_spin parameter, which we always set true here, but the
> > followup change will reuse the function in a context where it may be
> > false.
> >
> > Introduce __refill_objects() that uses the functions above to fill an
> > array of objects. It has to handle the possibility that the slabs will
> > contain more objects that were requested, due to concurrent freeing of
> > objects to those slabs. When no more slabs on partial lists are
> > available, it will allocate new slabs. It is intended to be only used
> > in context where spinning is allowed, so add a WARN_ON_ONCE check there.
> >
> > Finally, switch refill_sheaf() to use __refill_objects(). Sheaves are
> > only refilled from contexts that allow spinning, or even blocking.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > mm/slub.c | 293 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 272 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > index 22acc249f9c0..142a1099bbc1 100644
> > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > @@ -778,7 +786,8 @@ __update_freelist_slow(struct slab *slab, struct freelist_counters *old,
> > slab_lock(slab);
> > if (slab->freelist == old->freelist &&
> > slab->counters == old->counters) {
> > - slab->freelist = new->freelist;
> > + /* prevent tearing for the read in get_partial_node_bulk() */
> > + WRITE_ONCE(slab->freelist, new->freelist);
>
> Should this perhaps be WRITE_ONCE(slab->counters, new->counters) here?
Agreed, this should be WRITE_ONCE(slab->counters, new->counters);
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon