Re: [RFC PATCH v5 00/10] mm: Hot page tracking and promotion infrastructure
From: Bharata B Rao
Date: Wed Feb 11 2026 - 21:16:57 EST
On 11-Feb-26 9:34 PM, Gregory Price wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 09:00:26PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
>> =====================================================================================
>> Base Base pghot-default
>> pghot-precise
>> NUMAB0 NUMAB2 NUMAB2 NUMAB2
>> =====================================================================================
>> harmonic_mean_TEPS 5.10676e+08 7.56804e+08 5.92473e+08 7.47091e+08
>> mean_time 8.41027 5.67508 7.24915 5.74886
>> median_TEPS 5.11535e+08 7.24252e+08 5.63155e+08 7.71638e+08
>> max_TEPS 5.1785e+08 1.06051e+09 7.88018e+08 1.0504e+09
>>
>> pgpromote_success 0 13557718 13737730 13734469
>> numa_pte_updates 0 26491591 26848847 26726856
>> numa_hint_faults 0 13558077 13882743 13798024
>> =====================================================================================
>>
>
> Can you contextualize TEPS? Higher better? Higher worse? etc.
In the Graph500 benchmark, higher TEPS (Traversed Edges Per Second) values are
better.
Regards,
Bharata.