Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Add a new ACPI HID for GOOG5000 I2C controller

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Mon, Mar 02, 2026 at 06:37:38AM +0100, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2026 at 12:47:47PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 09:52:48PM +0000, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 08:51:26PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 06:23:07PM +0000, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> > > > > Define a new ACPI HID for GOOG5000 as used on Google Axion.
> > > > >
> > > > > This has been validated on Silicon.
> > > 
> > > > > Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Jan Dabros <jsd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > > Please, put Cc list...
> > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <moritzf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > 
> > > > ...somewhere here. It will have the same effect on the email. But the
> > > > positive
> > > > outcome is the noise reduction in the commit message.
> > > 
> > > > See also this discussion (patch 18 subthread):
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260123113708.416727-19-bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > > 
> > > Ok, fair. Do you want me to resend or do you want to patch it when
> > > applying?
> > 
> > I'm not a maintainer, so from my p.o.v. the safest option is to send a new
> > version with all data gathered and put properly (Cc list, ACPI excerpt, et
> > cetera) in one place.
> 
> I don't think the excerpt adds any real value.

It doesn't per se in the commit message. I am asking to have it in the comment
block for the record (in the mailing list archives).

> Only thing that really
> matters is that the ACPI ID is "correct" meaning that it is properly
> assigned by the owner and that's true here. For the CC list does not matter
> to me but if you want to resend with that fixed no problem.
> 
> Either way,
> 
> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko