Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] mm: cma: Export cma_get_name

From: Maxime Ripard

Date: Mon Mar 02 2026 - 04:23:43 EST


Hi,

On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 09:43:12PM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 2/27/26 14:15, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > The CMA dma-buf heap uses the cma_get_name() function to get the name of
> > the heap instance it's going to create.
> >
> > However, this function is not exported. Since we want to turn the CMA
> > heap into a module, let's export it.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > mm/cma.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c
> > index be142b473f3bd41b9c7d8ba4397f018f6993d962..550effb9c4e01cc488b5744fe61d55a5b70a6d6c 100644
> > --- a/mm/cma.c
> > +++ b/mm/cma.c
> > @@ -50,10 +50,11 @@ unsigned long cma_get_size(const struct cma *cma)
> >
> > const char *cma_get_name(const struct cma *cma)
> > {
> > return cma->name;
> > }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cma_get_name);
>
> No real reason to not squash this patch into #5, right?

I was assuming it was not really the same "category" of the API than
alloc/free, so the reviews might not be the same (like they weren't for
dma_contiguous_default_area). But I guess it also makes sense to squash
both.

I'll update the series

Thanks!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature