Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce QPW for per-cpu operations (v2)

[Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)]

On 3/2/26 16:49, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Proposed solution:
> A new interface called Queue PerCPU Work (QPW), which should replace
> Work Queue in the above mentioned use case.
> 
> If CONFIG_QPW=n this interfaces just wraps the current
> local_locks + WorkQueue behavior, so no expected change in runtime.
> 
> If CONFIG_QPW=y, and qpw kernel boot option =1, 
> queue_percpu_work_on(cpu,...) will lock that cpu's per-cpu structure
> and perform work on it locally. This is possible because on 
> functions that can be used for performing remote work on remote 
> per-cpu structures, the local_lock (which is already
> a this_cpu spinlock()), will be replaced by a qpw_spinlock(), which
> is able to get the pe
A process thing: several patches have Leo's S-o-b: but not From:
You probably need his From: and your Co-developed-by: or some other variant,
see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst section "When to use
Acked-by:, Cc:, and Co-developed-by:"