Re: [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-r5f: Add memory-region-names

[Markus Schneider-Pargmann]

Hi Conor,

On Tue Mar 3, 2026 at 7:33 PM CET, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 06:31:56PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 04:13:00PM +0100, Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI) wrote:
>> > Add names to the memory-region-names for easier idenfitication of memory
>> > regions.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI) <msp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> >  .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml          | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>> >  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml
>> > index 6aadc61e20f9f4c27f5b9c87ab2025a02776c5de..76ef23afe8c9f7f155dfec7fcabc7c60b8b286c6 100644
>> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml
>> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml
>> > @@ -182,6 +182,25 @@ patternProperties:
>> >            - description: DM RM/PM trace and firmware code/data
>> >          additionalItems: true
>> >  
>> > +      memory-region-names:
>> > +        description: |
>> > +          Optional names for the memory regions specified in the memory-region
>> 
>> Is this really optional? Shouldn't it be made mandatory so that it is
>> easy to tell the difference between the two configurations?
>
> Actually, so that you can tell at all, since it looks like anything from
> 2 to 8 regions is permitted (which this prop doesn't account for I guess,
> only allowing 2 or 6 regions).

Thanks for your feedback. I will fix both, make memory-region-names
required and fix the inconsistency between both properties regarding
what is allowed.

Best
Markus

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature