Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-x86 tree with the tip tree
From: Sean Christopherson
Date: Wed Mar 04 2026 - 18:14:10 EST
On Wed, Mar 04, 2026, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-x86 tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx_global_metadata.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 311214bf1df4b ("x86/virt/tdx: Retrieve TDX module version")
>
> from the tip tree and commit:
>
> 75b6c694eaed4 ("x86/virt/tdx: Tag a pile of functions as __init, and globals as __ro_after_init")
>
> from the kvm-x86 tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx_global_metadata.c
> index 4c9917a9c2c39,360963bc9328f..0000000000000
> --- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx_global_metadata.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx_global_metadata.c
> @@@ -7,22 -7,7 +7,22 @@@
> * Include this file to other C file instead.
> */
>
> +static int get_tdx_sys_info_version(struct tdx_sys_info_version *sysinfo_version)
Functionally this is a-ok, but we should remember to mention to Linus (and Paolo)
that this can be marked __init when the two branches get smushed together.
Thanks Mark!
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + u64 val;
> +
> + if (!ret && !(ret = read_sys_metadata_field(0x0800000100000003, &val)))
> + sysinfo_version->minor_version = val;
> + if (!ret && !(ret = read_sys_metadata_field(0x0800000100000004, &val)))
> + sysinfo_version->major_version = val;
> + if (!ret && !(ret = read_sys_metadata_field(0x0800000100000005, &val)))
> + sysinfo_version->update_version = val;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> - static int get_tdx_sys_info_features(struct tdx_sys_info_features *sysinfo_features)
> + static __init int get_tdx_sys_info_features(struct tdx_sys_info_features *sysinfo_features)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> u64 val;