Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mm: rename zone->lock to zone->_lock

[SeongJae Park]

On Thu, 5 Mar 2026 18:59:43 +0000 Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> Following the suggestion from SJ and Vlastimil, I prepared fixup to
> standardize documentation and comments on the term "zone lock".
> 
> The patch is based on top of the current mm-new.
> 
> Andrew, please let me know if you would prefer a respin of the series
> instead.
> 
> From 267cda3e0e160f97b346009bc48819bfeed92e52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 10:36:17 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: documentation: standardize on "zone lock" terminology
> 
> During review of the zone lock tracing series it was suggested to
> standardize documentation and comments on the term "zone lock"
> instead of using zone_lock or referring to the internal field
> zone->_lock.
> 
> Update references accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx>


THanks,
SJ

[...]