Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] ASoC: tas2781: Add tas5832 support

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 06/03/2026 11:08, Ding, Shenghao wrote:
> Hi, Krzysztof & Andy,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Monday, March 2, 2026 6:09 PM
>> To: andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: Xu, Baojun <baojun.xu@xxxxxx>; broonie@xxxxxxxxxx; tiwai@xxxxxxx;
>> 13916275206@xxxxxxx; Ding, Shenghao <shenghao-ding@xxxxxx>; linux-
>> sound@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lgirdwood@xxxxxxxxx;
>> robh@xxxxxxxxxx; krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
>> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Yi, Ken <k-yi@xxxxxx>; Lo, Henry
>> <henry.lo@xxxxxx>; Chen, Robin <robinchen@xxxxxx>; Wang, Will <will-
>> wang@xxxxxx>; jim.shil@xxxxxxxxxxx; toastcheng@xxxxxxxxxx;
>> chinkaiting@xxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] ASoC: tas2781: Add tas5832
>> support
>>
> ...
>>> ...
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> static const struct of_device_id tasdevice_of_match[] = {
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       { .compatible = "ti,tas5827" },
>>>>>>>>>>>       { .compatible = "ti,tas5828" },
>>>>>>>>>>>       { .compatible = "ti,tas5830" },
>>>>>>>>>>> +     { .compatible = "ti,tas5832" },
>>>>>>>>>>
> ...
>>>
>>> I don't know what you are trying to get from them, but I²C enumeration
>>> on DT platforms works in a way that it takes two tables into account,
>>> hence, if there is no compatible (with given part number) there will
>>> be no matching name.
>>>
>>> AFAIK it has to have a compatible to make it work in such a case.
>>> What did I miss?
>>
>> Show me please then how the OF table is used here at all to get the name.
> 
> This code will also be used for ACPI devices. To ensure consistent bin file 
> naming between ACPI and DTS devices, the mapping table tasdevice_id[]
> has been introduced.

We need to stop discussing with irrelevant arguments, really.

I asked to show me how this is going to be used in DT. No answer to this
part.

Now you claim this OF ID will be used for ACPI devices, but YOU HAVE
already ACPI table there, so that's clearly invalid argument. Do you
understand how patch/email review works? Where the comments appear and
what is being discussed?

> The code retrieves the corresponding name of the chip from tasdevice_id[]
> based on its order in tasdevice_of_match[] or tasdevice_acpi_match[].

Based on the order in table? No, that's crazy buggy solution to tie
order of entries in both tables. And it makes no sense... and I am sure
code does not do it, so again irrelevant argument.

NAK, because all the replies so far are off-topic.

Best regards,
Krzysztof