Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] iio: accel: convert to guard(mutex)

[Rajveer Chaudhari]

Hello Jonathan,

I am sorry for making things confusing, do you want me to re-send V3
on a new separate email thread?
Or I should keep this in mind for future patches.

Thankyou,
Rajveer

On Sat, Mar 7, 2026 at 3:56 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat,  7 Mar 2026 15:47:55 +0530
> Rajveer Chaudhari <rajveer.chaudhari.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > This series converts manual mutex_lock/mutex_unlock pairs to
> > guard(mutex) in three ADXL accelerometer drivers. Each conversion
> > also simplifies error handling by removing goto labels and
> > returning directly where possible.
> >
> > v3: Remove remaining goto labels completely as requested by David Lechner.
> >     Return directly from functions where ret variable is not needed.
> > v2: Split into one patch per driver as requested by David Lechner.
> >     Ensured each conversion also simplifies code flow.
> >
> > Rajveer Chaudhari (3):
> >   iio: accel: adxl313: convert to guard(mutex)
> >   iio: accel: adxl355: convert to guard(mutex)
> >   iio: accel: adxl372: convert to guard(mutex)
> >
> >  drivers/iio/accel/adxl313_core.c | 15 ++----
> >  drivers/iio/accel/adxl355_core.c | 81 ++++++++++++++------------------
> >  drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c      | 16 +++----
> >  3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Hi Rajveer,
>
> Small process thing.  Please send each new version as a separate email
> thread.  It can get very hard to follow when we end up with deeply
> nested threads so most areas of the kernel prefer to just associate
> them via name of the thread and possibly a link in the cover letter
> to the previous version.
>
> Jonathan