Re: [PATCH] mfd: Congatec: fix kernel-doc struct member names

From: Lee Jones

Date: Mon Mar 09 2026 - 05:52:46 EST


On Fri, 06 Mar 2026, Randy Dunlap wrote:

>
>
> On 3/6/26 4:58 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Feb 2026, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> >> Correct the struct member names to avoid kernel-doc warnings:
> >>
> >> Warning: include/linux/mfd/cgbc.h:38 struct member 'version' not
> >> described in 'cgbc_device_data'
> >> Warning: ../include/linux/mfd/cgbc.h:38 struct member 'lock' not
> >> described in 'cgbc_device_data'
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> Cc: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> include/linux/mfd/cgbc.h | 4 ++--
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > b4 is having a hard time with this set:
> >
> > Analyzing 4 messages in the thread
> > Assuming new revision: v2 ([PATCH] mfd: rsmu: remove a empty kernel-doc line)
> > Assuming new revision: v3 ([PATCH] mfd: Kontron PLD: fix kernel-doc struct member names)
> > Assuming new revision: v4 ([PATCH] mfd: si476x: fix kernel-doc warnings)
> > Will use the latest revision: v4
> > You can pick other revisions using the -vN flag
> > Specified msgid is not present in the series, cannot cherrypick
> >
> > Can you please resubmit as a proper set (1/4 -> 4/4)?
>
> You also replied that you had applied the "rsmu" patch.
> Should I just resend the other 3 patches?

Thanks for spotting that, I assumed all had failed.

Please resend all of 4 of them.

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]