Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: soc/reset: ti: add binding for k3 platforms reset module

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 09/03/2026 11:07, A. Sverdlin wrote:
> From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Add DT binding for Texas Instruments K3 Multicore SoC platforms reset
> module present on AM64x and newer members of the K3 family and consists of
> the RST_CTRL, RST_STAT, RST_SRC and RST_MAGIC_WORD registers.
> 
> The planned usage is to provide reset reason information.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../bindings/reset/ti,am64-rst.yaml           | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../soc/ti/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml    | 11 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti,am64-rst.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti,am64-rst.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti,am64-rst.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..5a17cee9c6528
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti,am64-rst.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/reset/ti,am64-rst.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Texas Instruments K3 Multicore SoC platforms reset module
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description: |

Do not need '|' unless you need to preserve formatting.

> +  Texas Instruments (ARM64) K3 Multicore SoC platforms reset module is present
> +  on AM64x and newer members of the K3 family and consists of the RST_CTRL,
> +  RST_STAT, RST_SRC and RST_MAGIC_WORD registers.
> +
> +properties:
> +  $nodename:
> +    pattern: "^rst@[0-9a-f]+$"

Drop. Neither correct, nor needed.

> +
> +  compatible:
> +    items:

Drop items

> +      - const: ti,am64-rst
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    rst@43018170 {
> +        compatible = "ti,am64-rst";
> +        reg = <0x43018170 0x10>;

This looks like just 4 registers, so part of syscon....

> +    };
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml
> index f3bd0be3b279f..a2071a1668f96 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml
> @@ -86,6 +86,12 @@ patternProperties:
>      description:
>        This is the DSS OLDI CTRL region.
>  
> +  "^rst@[0-9a-f]+$":
> +    type: object
> +    $ref: /schemas/reset/ti,am64-rst.yaml#

And here is a proof. No, individual registers are not separate devices.

Not a separate device = no device node.


Best regards,
Krzysztof