Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs-brauner tree

[Jens Axboe]

On 3/6/26 7:22 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 10:34:02AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
>> Yeah, one of us should have to rebase to the other. Since mine is just a
>> single patch on the one colliding file, I think it easiest if I just
>> rebase my data alignment updates to the vfs integrity branch, then send
>> upstream through there. Let me know if there's an alternate preference.
> 
> Yes, I think that would work best.
> 
> Jens: is this okay with you?

I think the mistake here is the fact that the integrity stuff got
ingested wholesale on the VFS side. That should've been split. So
why don't we redo that part? I stage the first 7 in a branch off
-rc1, Christian pulls those in, and stages the ntfs3/iomap/xfs
on top. That's how it should've been done so let's please just do
that now, rather than make an even bigger mess of this.

-- 
Jens Axboe