Re: [PATCH v16 07/10] cxl: Update error handlers to support CXL Port devices

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Mon, 2 Mar 2026 14:36:45 -0600
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> CXL Protocol trace logging is called for Endpoints in cxl_handle_ras() and
> cxl_handle_cor_ras(). Trace logging support for CXL Port devices is missing.
> 
> CXL Endpoint trace logging utilizes a separate trace routine than CXL Port
> device handling. Using is_cxl_memdev(), determine if the device is a CXL EP
> or one of the CXL Port devices.
> 
> Update cxl_handle_ras() and cxl_handle_cor_ras() to call the CXL Port trace
> logging function. Change cxl_handle_ras() return values to be pci_ers_result_t
> type.

Why this last bit?

> 
> Check for invalid ras_base and add log messages if NULL.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@xxxxxxx>

A few comments inline.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
> index 48d3ef7cbb92..254144d19764 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
> @@ -291,15 +291,22 @@ void cxl_handle_cor_ras(struct device *dev, u64 serial, void __iomem *ras_base)
>  	void __iomem *addr;
>  	u32 status;
>  
> -	if (!ras_base)
> +	if (!ras_base) {
> +		pr_err_ratelimited("%s: CXL RAS registers aren't mapped\n",
> +				   dev_name(dev));

This print isn't mentioned in the commit message. Probably needs some comment
on why all paths that get here are error paths.

>  		return;
> +	}
>  
>  	addr = ras_base + CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_OFFSET;
>  	status = readl(addr);
> -	if (status & CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK) {
> -		writel(status & CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK, addr);
> +	if (!(status & CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK))
> +		return;
> +
> +	writel(status & CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK, addr);
> +	if (is_cxl_memdev(dev))
>  		trace_cxl_aer_correctable_error(dev, status, serial);
> -	}
> +	else
> +		trace_cxl_port_aer_correctable_error(dev, status);
>  }
>  
>  /* CXL spec rev3.0 8.2.4.16.1 */
> @@ -321,22 +328,26 @@ static void header_log_copy(void __iomem *ras_base, u32 *log)
>  
>  /*
>   * Log the state of the RAS status registers and prepare them to log the
> - * next error status. Return 1 if reset needed.
> + * next error status. Return PCI_ERS_RESULT_PANIC if reset needed.

This seems odd as normally PANIC implies more than reset.  I guess system reset,
kind of...

>   */
> -bool cxl_handle_ras(struct device *dev, u64 serial, void __iomem *ras_base)
> +pci_ers_result_t
> +cxl_handle_ras(struct device *dev, u64 serial, void __iomem *ras_base)
>  {
>  	u32 hl[CXL_HEADERLOG_SIZE_U32];
>  	void __iomem *addr;
>  	u32 status;
>  	u32 fe;
>  
> -	if (!ras_base)
> -		return false;
> +	if (!ras_base) {
> +		pr_err_ratelimited("%s: CXL RAS registers aren't mapped\n",
> +				   dev_name(dev));
> +		return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE;
> +	}
>  
>  	addr = ras_base + CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_STATUS_OFFSET;
>  	status = readl(addr);
>  	if (!(status & CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK))
> -		return false;
> +		return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE;
>  
>  	/* If multiple errors, log header points to first error from ctrl reg */
>  	if (hweight32(status) > 1) {
> @@ -350,10 +361,13 @@ bool cxl_handle_ras(struct device *dev, u64 serial, void __iomem *ras_base)
>  	}
>  
>  	header_log_copy(ras_base, hl);
> -	trace_cxl_aer_uncorrectable_error(dev, status, fe, hl, serial);
> +	if (is_cxl_memdev(dev))
> +		trace_cxl_aer_uncorrectable_error(dev, status, fe, hl, serial);
> +	else
> +		trace_cxl_port_aer_uncorrectable_error(dev, status, fe, hl);
>  	writel(status & CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK, addr);
>  
> -	return true;
> +	return PCI_ERS_RESULT_PANIC;
>  }
>  
>  void cxl_cor_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev)