[PATCH 5/5] sched_ext: Reject sub-sched attachment to a disabled parent
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Mon Mar 09 2026 - 21:17:43 EST
scx_claim_exit() propagates exits to descendants under scx_sched_lock.
A sub-sched being attached concurrently could be missed if it links
after the propagation. Check the parent's exit_kind in scx_link_sched()
under scx_sched_lock to interlock against scx_claim_exit() - either the
parent sees the child in its iteration or the child sees the parent's
non-NONE exit_kind and fails attachment.
Fixes: ebeca1f930ea ("sched_ext: Introduce cgroup sub-sched support")
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/ext.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 677c1c6c64bf..5d31e65e5596 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -5247,6 +5247,17 @@ static s32 scx_link_sched(struct scx_sched *sch)
s32 ret;
if (parent) {
+ /*
+ * scx_claim_exit() propagates exit_kind transition to
+ * its sub-scheds while holding scx_sched_lock - either
+ * we can see the parent's non-NONE exit_kind or the
+ * parent can shoot us down.
+ */
+ if (atomic_read(&parent->exit_kind) != SCX_EXIT_NONE) {
+ scx_error(sch, "parent disabled");
+ return -ENOENT;
+ }
+
ret = rhashtable_lookup_insert_fast(&scx_sched_hash,
&sch->hash_node, scx_sched_hash_params);
if (ret) {
@@ -5638,6 +5649,11 @@ static bool scx_claim_exit(struct scx_sched *sch, enum scx_exit_kind kind)
* serialized, running them in separate threads allows parallelizing
* ops.exit(), which can take arbitrarily long prolonging bypass mode.
*
+ * To guarantee forward progress, this propagation must be in-line so
+ * that ->aborting is synchronously asserted for all sub-scheds. The
+ * propagation is also the interlocking point against sub-sched
+ * attachment. See scx_link_sched().
+ *
* This doesn't cause recursions as propagation only takes place for
* non-propagation exits.
*/
--
2.53.0