Re: [PATCH 06/61] 9p: Prefer IS_ERR_OR_NULL over manual NULL check
From: Christian Schoenebeck
Date: Tue Mar 10 2026 - 10:51:18 EST
On Tuesday, 10 March 2026 12:48:32 CET Philipp Hahn wrote:
> Prefer using IS_ERR_OR_NULL() over using IS_ERR() and a manual NULL
> check.
>
> Change generated with coccinelle.
>
> To: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: v9fs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Hahn <phahn-oss@xxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/9p/fid.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
"fs/9p" in the subject on this one, please, not just "9p".
Except of that:
Reviewed-by: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> diff --git a/fs/9p/fid.h b/fs/9p/fid.h
> index
> 0d6138bee2a3d1ab565ab2d210c0a3f3bf97e4e3..3bb7ef4380e972a2d9ab67eb4aab6cc5b
> fe2eea7 100644 --- a/fs/9p/fid.h
> +++ b/fs/9p/fid.h
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline struct p9_fid *v9fs_fid_clone(struct dentry
> *dentry) struct p9_fid *fid, *nfid;
>
> fid = v9fs_fid_lookup(dentry);
> - if (!fid || IS_ERR(fid))
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fid))
> return fid;
>
> nfid = clone_fid(fid);