Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: Add ICE phandle

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 05:05:55PM +0530, Neeraj Soni wrote:
> Starting with sc7280(kodiak), the ICE will have its own device-tree node.
> So add the qcom,ice property to reference it.
> 
> To avoid double-modeling, when qcom,ice is present, disallow an embedded
> ICE register region in the SDHCI node. Older SoCs without ICE remain
> valid as no additional requirement is imposed.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Abhinaba Rakshit <abhinaba.rakshit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Abhinaba Rakshit <abhinaba.rakshit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Soni <neeraj.soni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 

Can you please finally start using b4? Except errors in your process I
don't see links to previous discussions either.

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
will do that for tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof