RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 03/61] ceph: Prefer IS_ERR_OR_NULL over manual NULL check
From: Loktionov, Aleksandr
Date: Wed Mar 11 2026 - 04:19:40 EST
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf
> Of Philipp Hahn
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2026 12:48 PM
> To: amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; apparmor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; cocci@xxxxxxxx; dm-
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> gfs2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; intel-wired-
> lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> erofs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> hyperv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-input@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-leds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx;
> linux-modules@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> phy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-sctp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-security-
> module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> sound@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-stm32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-trace-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> ntfs3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; samba-technical@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; sched-
> ext@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; target-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tipc-
> discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; v9fs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Philipp Hahn
> <phahn-oss@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx>; Alex Markuze
> <amarkuze@xxxxxxxxxx>; Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 03/61] ceph: Prefer IS_ERR_OR_NULL
> over manual NULL check
>
> Prefer using IS_ERR_OR_NULL() over using IS_ERR() and a manual NULL
> check.
>
> Change generated with coccinelle.
>
> To: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Alex Markuze <amarkuze@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Hahn <phahn-oss@xxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ceph/dir.c | 2 +-
> fs/ceph/snap.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/dir.c b/fs/ceph/dir.c index
> 86d7aa594ea99335af3e91a95c0a418fdc1b8a8a..934250748ae4fd4c148fd27bdf91
> 175047c2877d 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/dir.c
> @@ -889,7 +889,7 @@ int ceph_handle_notrace_create(struct inode *dir,
> struct dentry *dentry) {
> struct dentry *result = ceph_lookup(dir, dentry, 0);
>
> - if (result && !IS_ERR(result)) {
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(result)) {
> /*
> * We created the item, then did a lookup, and found
> * it was already linked to another inode we already
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/snap.c b/fs/ceph/snap.c index
> 52b4c2684f922bfed39550311e793bfe3622cd26..528ad581be160713f91416115659
> e2dc6f259576 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/snap.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/snap.c
> @@ -902,7 +902,7 @@ int ceph_update_snap_trace(struct ceph_mds_client
> *mdsc,
> bad:
> err = -EIO;
> fail:
> - if (realm && !IS_ERR(realm))
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(realm))
> ceph_put_snap_realm(mdsc, realm);
> if (first_realm)
> ceph_put_snap_realm(mdsc, first_realm);
>
> --
> 2.43.0
Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@xxxxxxxxx>