Re: [PATCH v4] mm/swap: strengthen locking assertions and invariants in cluster allocation
From: Chris Li
Date: Wed Mar 11 2026 - 13:34:43 EST
On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 7:23 PM Hui Zhu <hui.zhu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Hui Zhu <zhuhui@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The swap_cluster_alloc_table() function requires several locks to be held
> by its callers: ci->lock, the per-CPU swap_cluster lock, and, for
> non-solid-state devices (non-SWP_SOLIDSTATE), the si->global_cluster_lock.
>
> While most call paths (e.g., via cluster_alloc_swap_entry() or
> alloc_swap_scan_list()) correctly acquire these locks before invocation,
> the path through swap_reclaim_work() -> swap_reclaim_full_clusters() ->
> isolate_lock_cluster() is distinct. This path operates exclusively on
> si->full_clusters, where the swap allocation tables are guaranteed to be
> already allocated. Consequently, isolate_lock_cluster() should never
> trigger a call to swap_cluster_alloc_table() for these clusters.
>
> Strengthen the locking and state assertions to formalize these invariants:
>
> 1. Add a lockdep_assert_held() for si->global_cluster_lock in
> swap_cluster_alloc_table() for non-SWP_SOLIDSTATE devices.
> 2. Reorder existing lockdep assertions in swap_cluster_alloc_table() to
> match the actual lock acquisition order (per-CPU lock, then global lock,
> then cluster lock).
> 3. Add a VM_WARN_ON_ONCE() in isolate_lock_cluster() to ensure that table
> allocations are only attempted for clusters being isolated from the
> free list. Attempting to allocate a table for a cluster from other
> lists (like the full list during reclaim) indicates a violation of
> subsystem invariants.
>
> These changes ensure locking consistency and help catch potential
> synchronization or logic issues during development.
>
> Changelog:
> v4:
> According to the comments of Barry Song, remove redundant comment.
> v3:
> According to the comments of Kairui Song, squash patches and fix logic
> bug in isolate_lock_cluster() where flags were cleared before check.
> v2:
> According to the comments of YoungJun Park, Kairui Song and Chris Li,
> change acquire locks in swap_reclaim_work() to adds a VM_WARN_ON in
> isolate_lock_cluster().
> According to the comments of YoungJun Park, add code in patch 2 to Change
> the order of lockdep_assert_held() to match the actual lock acquisition
> order.
>
> Reviewed-by: Youngjun Park <youngjun.park@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Hui Zhu <zhuhui@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/swapfile.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> index 94af29d1de88..e25cdb0046d8 100644
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -476,8 +476,10 @@ swap_cluster_alloc_table(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> * Only cluster isolation from the allocator does table allocation.
> * Swap allocator uses percpu clusters and holds the local lock.
> */
> - lockdep_assert_held(&ci->lock);
> lockdep_assert_held(&this_cpu_ptr(&percpu_swap_cluster)->lock);
> + if (!(si->flags & SWP_SOLIDSTATE))
> + lockdep_assert_held(&si->global_cluster_lock);
> + lockdep_assert_held(&ci->lock);
>
> /* The cluster must be free and was just isolated from the free list. */
> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(ci->flags || !cluster_is_empty(ci));
> @@ -577,6 +579,7 @@ static struct swap_cluster_info *isolate_lock_cluster(
> struct swap_info_struct *si, struct list_head *list)
> {
> struct swap_cluster_info *ci, *found = NULL;
> + u8 flags;
Nit pick: consider initializing the value. The flags assignment occurs
in a conditional block. The compiler might or might not realize the
"flags" assigned only if "found" is also assigned, and might complain
that flags can be used without initialization.
>
> spin_lock(&si->lock);
> list_for_each_entry(ci, list, list) {
> @@ -589,6 +592,7 @@ static struct swap_cluster_info *isolate_lock_cluster(
> ci->flags != CLUSTER_FLAG_FULL);
>
> list_del(&ci->list);
> + flags = ci->flags;
If VM debug is disabled, this variable is not used after its value is
assigned. Please test it with gcc and llvm (VM debug disabled) to
ensure it doesn't generate any warnings. I don't expect it to be, I
just want to make sure.
Chris
> ci->flags = CLUSTER_FLAG_NONE;
> found = ci;
> break;
> @@ -597,6 +601,7 @@ static struct swap_cluster_info *isolate_lock_cluster(
>
> if (found && !cluster_table_is_alloced(found)) {
> /* Only an empty free cluster's swap table can be freed. */
> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(flags != CLUSTER_FLAG_FREE);
> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(list != &si->free_clusters);
> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!cluster_is_empty(found));
> return swap_cluster_alloc_table(si, found);
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>