Re: [PATCH 2/5] driver core: separate function to shutdown one device

[Bart Van Assche]

On 3/11/26 2:37 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Maybe it's just the lock anti-pattern below?

Yes, that's my only concern.

> I guess avoiding the "conditional acquisition and later conditional
> release" pattern mentioned at [1] is what makes this compatible with
> lock context analysis?

Correct.

> I guess this is another way of expressing the "no conditionally held
> locks" rule [2], which is more concise and fits better in my pea
> brain.
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/dev-tools/context-analysis.rst?id=v7.0-rc1#n42
> [2] https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ThreadSafetyAnalysis.html#no-conditionally-held-locks

Is this perhaps intended as a suggestion for simplifying the language in
Documentation/dev-tools/context-analysis.rst?

s/such as conditional acquisition and later conditional release in the 
same function/no conditionally held locks/

Thanks,

Bart.