Re: [PATCH 13/15] spi: Use trace_invoke_##name() at guarded tracepoint call sites

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 11:42:54AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > though not loving the naming here, I'll have a hard time figuring out
> > what the weird call is about next time I look at that code

> Would:

> 	trace_call__foo()

> Be better?

> Or do you have another name we should use?

Possibly an _unchecked or something?  Honestly the suggestion someone
had for _do seemed OK to me.  Part of it is that I wouldn't think of
tracepoints as being something that I'd call.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature