Re: [PATCH] gpu: nova: rename drivers to use kebab-case convention

[Danilo Krummrich]

On Thu Mar 12, 2026 at 8:21 PM CET, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 3/12/26 12:16 PM, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>> On Thu Mar 12, 2026 at 7:45 PM CET, Cheng-Yang Chou wrote:
> ...
>>> Would that work for you?
>> 
>> I think the module name should ideally match the directoy name, i.e. we have
>> 
>> 	drivers/gpu/nova-core/
>> 
>> with the module name "nova-core" and
>> 
>> 	drivers/gpu/drm/nova/
>> 
>> with the module name "nova-drm".
>
> When p
>
> When people do things like lsmod(1), they don't see the directory
> path for the module source code, so if the name doesn't include
> drm, then no one knows that "nova" implies "nova-drm".
>
> On the other hand, I was OK with just explaining to people that "nova"
> is the upper layer kernel module, and that it's the one that does
> DRM things.
>
> Which is why I'm merely "OK" with the name change, as opposed to
> thinking that it's required.

Just to clarify, I think we should change the directory name and the module name
to nova-drm; the above is what we'd get with the current patch.

>> 
>> The reason why this is not .../nova-drm/ already is that I figured it would be a
>> bit redundant given that "drm" is already part of the path.
>> 
>> While I don't mind changing this, I wonder what this would mean for the
>> Kconfig, CONFIG_DRM_NOVA_DRM? :)
>
> I also worry that we might not have enough DRM's in that
> CONFIG item. haha :)