Re: [PATCH 13/15] spi: Use trace_invoke_##name() at guarded tracepoint call sites

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 01:00:22PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Possibly an _unchecked or something?  Honestly the suggestion someone
> > had for _do seemed OK to me.  Part of it is that I wouldn't think of
> > tracepoints as being something that I'd call.

> The "__do_trace.." is an internal function I don't want to expose.

> I'm thinking of: call_trace_foo(), as that should be pretty obvious to what
> it is.

Yeah, like I day it was the concept of there being a call in a
tracepoint that was a bit of a surprise.  It was more a grumble than
anything else, I did ack the change.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature