Re: [PATCH v4 04/24] x86/virt/seamldr: Introduce a wrapper for P-SEAMLDR SEAMCALLs

[Dave Hansen]

On 2/24/26 02:25, Huang, Kai wrote:
> But I agree making it IRQ safe is the simplest way so that we don't need to
> worry about the deadlock.

Uh, we don't just disable interrupts so we don't have to worry about
things. We disable them when we *need* to functionally.