Re: [PATCH 06/15] cpufreq: Use trace_invoke_##name() at guarded tracepoint call sites

[Viresh Kumar]

On 12-03-26, 11:05, Vineeth Pillai (Google) wrote:
> Replace trace_foo() with the new trace_invoke_foo() at sites already
> guarded by trace_foo_enabled(), avoiding a redundant
> static_branch_unlikely() re-evaluation inside the tracepoint.
> trace_invoke_foo() calls the tracepoint callbacks directly without
> utilizing the static branch again.
> 
> Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Vineeth Pillai (Google) <vineeth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-sonnet-4-6
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c   | 10 +++++-----
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c      |  2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
viresh