Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: ti: icssg-prueth: Add HSR multicast FDB port membership management

[Simon Horman]

On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 01:59:23PM +0530, MD Danish Anwar wrote:
> In HSR offload mode, multicast addresses can be added via HSR master
> (hsr0) or directly to slave ports (eth1/eth2). The FDB must track port
> membership: P0 (0x1) for HSR master, P1 (0x2) for slave port 1, and P2
> (0x4) for slave port 2. When the same address is added from multiple
> paths, memberships must accumulate.
> 
> Implement a hybrid approach using __dev_mc_sync() callbacks to track
> basic add/delete operations, checking netdev_hw_addr->synced to
> distinguish HSR-synced addresses from direct additions. Post-process
> to handle overlapping memberships by checking refcount:
> - refcount=2 with synced=1: HSR only (P0)
> - refcount>=3 with synced=1: HSR + direct (P0|P1/P2)
> - synced=0 with P0 set: HSR removed, clean up orphaned P0
> 
> On add operations, accumulate new membership with existing ports. On
> delete operations, remove only the specific port and clean up orphaned
> P0 bits if needed.
> 
> Add error handling for icssg_fdb_lookup() which can return negative
> error codes (e.g., -ETIMEDOUT). On lookup failure in add/delete path,
> default to no existing membership. In the post-processing path, skip
> the address update to avoid corrupting FDB entries with garbage values.
> 
> VLAN Interface Handling:
> Add support for multicast addresses added to VLAN interfaces on the HSR
> master (e.g., hsr0.7). These addresses require P0 (HSR master) bit to be
> set along with the port bits, since VLAN-tagged packets use separate FDB
> entries per VLAN ID. Without P0, the HSR master would not receive
> multicast packets on VLAN interfaces.
> 
> Track whether the add/del operation came from a VLAN interface path and
> set P0 when in HSR offload mode with VLAN interfaces. Update orphaned P0
> cleanup logic to preserve P0 for VLAN interfaces.
> 
> Signed-off-by: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@xxxxxx>
> ---
> v1 -> v2: 
>    Added a helper function as suggested by Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for the update.

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>

It is unclear to me why this is marked as Not Applicable in patchwork.