Re: [PATCH 6/9] kernel/api: add API specification for sys_close

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 11:09:16AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> + *   Calling close() on a file descriptor while another thread is using it
> + *   (e.g., in a blocking read() or write()) has implementation-defined
> + *   behavior. On Linux, the blocked operation continues on the underlying
> + *   file and may complete even after close() returns.

I'm guessing this came from the man pages?  This is Linux, so we are the
"implementation" here :)

thanks,

greg k-h