Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] media: dt-bindings: Document SC8280XP/SM8350 Iris

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 09:25:14AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/03/2026 09:14, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 08:55:00AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> The Iris block on SM8350 and SC8280XP is compatible with the Iris
> >>> (Venus) on SM8250. Document those two IP cores, using qcom,sm8250-venus
> >>> as a fallback compatible.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml | 10 ++++++++--
> >>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml
> >>> index 43a10d9f664e..3700f8fe91cc 100644
> >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml
> >>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ maintainers:
> >>>    - Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>  
> >>>  description: |
> >>> -  The Venus IP is a video encode and decode accelerator present
> >>> +  The Iris2 IP is a video encode and decode accelerator present
> >>
> >> Why Venus name disappears? And why now this is Iris2, not Iris? It's the
> >> first time such name is used. Just call it Venus/Iris if the new devices
> >> renamed the block.
> > 
> > SM8150, SC8180X had Iris 1.xx. SM8250 and SC7280 have Iris 2.xx. But
> > when the bindings were written, it seems, it wasn't obvious (or
> > important enough). I will change this to Venus / Iris 2.xx
> 
> Then "Iris v2.xx", how we call versions of blocks in all other cases.
> The block is simply Iris, not Iris2, right?

Ack.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry