Re: [PATCH] ALSA: usb-audio: validate full match when resolving quirk aliases
From: Takashi Iwai
Date: Sat Mar 14 2026 - 09:46:33 EST
On Sat, 14 Mar 2026 04:34:46 +0100,
Cássio Gabriel wrote:
>
> get_alias_quirk() resolves a quirk for an aliased USB ID by scanning
> usb_audio_ids[], but it currently checks only the vendor/product pair.
>
> This can make an aliased ID pick the first entry with a matching
> vid:pid even when that entry also depends on interface descriptor
> fields that do not match the actual device or interface.
>
> Fix it by re-checking each aliased candidate with usb_match_one_id()
> against the real interface before returning the quirk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cássio Gabriel <cassiogabrielcontato@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> sound/usb/card.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/usb/card.c b/sound/usb/card.c
> index 270dad84d825..ff4418017763 100644
> --- a/sound/usb/card.c
> +++ b/sound/usb/card.c
> @@ -870,17 +870,28 @@ static void find_last_interface(struct snd_usb_audio *chip)
>
> /* look for the corresponding quirk */
> static const struct snd_usb_audio_quirk *
> -get_alias_quirk(struct usb_device *dev, unsigned int id)
> +get_alias_quirk(struct usb_interface *intf, unsigned int id)
> {
> const struct usb_device_id *p;
> + struct usb_device_id id_alias;
>
> for (p = usb_audio_ids; p->match_flags; p++) {
> - /* FIXME: this checks only vendor:product pair in the list */
> if ((p->match_flags & USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_DEVICE) ==
> USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_DEVICE &&
> p->idVendor == USB_ID_VENDOR(id) &&
> - p->idProduct == USB_ID_PRODUCT(id))
> - return (const struct snd_usb_audio_quirk *)p->driver_info;
> + p->idProduct == USB_ID_PRODUCT(id)) {
> + /*
> + * Re-check the aliased entry against the actual
> + * interface descriptors instead of matching only
> + * the vendor/product pair.
> + */
> + id_alias = *p;
> + id_alias.idVendor = USB_ID_VENDOR(id);
> + id_alias.idProduct = USB_ID_PRODUCT(id);
> +
> + if (usb_match_one_id(intf, &id_alias))
Hmm, is this really a correct logic?
In this case, USB_ID_VENDOR(id) and USB_ID_PRODUCT(id) are very same
as p->idVendor and p->idProduct, hence id_alias and *p are identical,
i.e. you're basically comparing against *p.
I suppose you wanted to substitute the original device vendor/product
IDs there instead?
thanks,
Takashi