Re: [PATCH v3] iomap: add allocation cache for iomap_dio

From: changfengnan

Date: Mon Mar 16 2026 - 07:41:01 EST



> From: "Dave Chinner"<david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:  Thu, Jan 15, 2026, 13:02
> Subject:  Re: [PATCH v3] iomap: add allocation cache for iomap_dio
> To: "guzebing"<guzebing1612@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>, <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>, <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <guzebing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <syzbot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Fengnan Chang"<changfengnan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, "Vlastimil Babka"<vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> [cc linux-mm]
> 
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 10:11:08AM +0800, guzebing wrote:
> > As implemented by the bio structure, we do the same thing on the
> > iomap-dio structure. Add a per-cpu cache for iomap_dio allocations,
> > enabling us to quickly recycle them instead of going through the slab
> > allocator.
>
> > By making such changes, we can reduce memory allocation on the direct
> > IO path, so that direct IO will not block due to insufficient system
> > memory. In addition, for direct IO, the read performance of io_uring
> > is improved by about 2.6%.
> 
> Honestly, this just feels wrong.
> 
> If heap memory allocation has performance issues, then the right
> solution is to fix the memory allocator.
> 
> Oh, wait, you're copy-pasting the hacky per-cpu bio allocator cache
> lists into the iomap DIO code.
> 
> IMO, this really should be part of the generic memory allocation
> APIs, not repeatedly tacked on the outside of specific individual
> object allocations.
> 
> <thinks a bit>
> 
> Huh. per-cpu free lists is the traditional SLAB allocator
> architecture. That was removed a while back because SLUB performs
> better in most cases....
> 
> <thinks a bit more>
> 
> ISTR somebody was already working to optimise the SLUB allocator to
> address these corner case shortcomings w.r.t. traditional SLABs.
> 
> Yup:
> 
> 
> commit 2d517aa09bbc4203f10cdee7e1d42f3bbdc1b1cd
> Author: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> Date:   Wed Sep 3 14:59:45 2025 +0200
> 
>     slab: add opt-in caching layer of percpu sheaves
> 
>     Specifying a non-zero value for a new struct kmem_cache_args field
>     sheaf_capacity will setup a caching layer of percpu arrays called
>     sheaves of given capacity for the created cache.
> 
>     Allocations from the cache will allocate via the percpu sheaves (main or
>     spare) as long as they have no NUMA node preference. Frees will also
>     put the object back into one of the sheaves.
> 
>     When both percpu sheaves are found empty during an allocation, an empty
>     sheaf may be replaced with a full one from the per-node barn. If none
>     are available and the allocation is allowed to block, an empty sheaf is
>     refilled from slab(s) by an internal bulk alloc operation. When both
>     percpu sheaves are full during freeing, the barn can replace a full one
>     with an empty one, unless over a full sheaves limit. In that case a
>     sheaf is flushed to slab(s) by an internal bulk free operation. Flushing
>     sheaves and barns is also wired to the existing cpu flushing and cache
>     shrinking operations.
> 
>     The sheaves do not distinguish NUMA locality of the cached objects. If
>     an allocation is requested with kmem_cache_alloc_node() (or a mempolicy
>     with strict_numa mode enabled) with a specific node (not NUMA_NO_NODE),
>     the sheaves are bypassed.
> 
>     The bulk operations exposed to slab users also try to utilize the
>     sheaves as long as the necessary (full or empty) sheaves are available
>     on the cpu or in the barn. Once depleted, they will fallback to bulk
>     alloc/free to slabs directly to avoid double copying.
> 
>     The sheaf_capacity value is exported in sysfs for observability.
> 
>     Sysfs CONFIG_SLUB_STATS counters alloc_cpu_sheaf and free_cpu_sheaf
>     count objects allocated or freed using the sheaves (and thus not
>     counting towards the other alloc/free path counters). Counters
>     sheaf_refill and sheaf_flush count objects filled or flushed from or to
>     slab pages, and can be used to assess how effective the caching is. The
>     refill and flush operations will also count towards the usual
>     alloc_fastpath/slowpath, free_fastpath/slowpath and other counters for
>     the backing slabs.  For barn operations, barn_get and barn_put count how
>     many full sheaves were get from or put to the barn, the _fail variants
>     count how many such requests could not be satisfied mainly  because the
>     barn was either empty or full. While the barn also holds empty sheaves
>     to make some operations easier, these are not as critical to mandate own
>     counters.  Finally, there are sheaf_alloc/sheaf_free counters.
> 
>     Access to the percpu sheaves is protected by local_trylock() when
>     potential callers include irq context, and local_lock() otherwise (such
>     as when we already know the gfp flags allow blocking). The trylock
>     failures should be rare and we can easily fallback. Each per-NUMA-node
>     barn has a spin_lock.
> 
>     When slub_debug is enabled for a cache with sheaf_capacity also
>     specified, the latter is ignored so that allocations and frees reach the
>     slow path where debugging hooks are processed. Similarly, we ignore it
>     with CONFIG_SLUB_TINY which prefers low memory usage to performance.
> 
>     [boot failure: https://lore.kernel.org/all/583eacf5-c971-451a-9f76-fed0e341b815@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ ]
> 
>     Reported-and-tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Yeah, recent code, functionality is not enabled by default yet. So,
> kmem_cache_alloc() with:
> 
> struct kmem_cache_args {
> .....
>         /**
>          * @sheaf_capacity: Enable sheaves of given capacity for the cache.
>          *
>          * With a non-zero value, allocations from the cache go through caching
>          * arrays called sheaves. Each cpu has a main sheaf that's always
>          * present, and a spare sheaf that may be not present. When both become
>          * empty, there's an attempt to replace an empty sheaf with a full sheaf
>          * from the per-node barn.
>          *
>          * When no full sheaf is available, and gfp flags allow blocking, a
>          * sheaf is allocated and filled from slab(s) using bulk allocation.
>          * Otherwise the allocation falls back to the normal operation
>          * allocating a single object from a slab.
>          *
>          * Analogically when freeing and both percpu sheaves are full, the barn
>          * may replace it with an empty sheaf, unless it's over capacity. In
>          * that case a sheaf is bulk freed to slab pages.
>          *
>          * The sheaves do not enforce NUMA placement of objects, so allocations
>          * via kmem_cache_alloc_node() with a node specified other than
>          * NUMA_NO_NODE will bypass them.
>          *
>          * Bulk allocation and free operations also try to use the cpu sheaves
>          * and barn, but fallback to using slab pages directly.
>          *
>          * When slub_debug is enabled for the cache, the sheaf_capacity argument
>          * is ignored.
>          *
>          * %0 means no sheaves will be created.
>          */
>         unsigned int sheaf_capacity;
> }
> 
> set to the value required is all we need. i.e. something like this
> in iomap_dio_init():
> 
> 
>         struct kmem_cache_args kmem_args = {
>                 .sheaf_capacity = 256,
>         };
> 
>         dio_kmem_cache = kmem_cache_create("iomap_dio", sizeof(struct iomap_dio),
>                         &kmem_args, SLAB_PANIC | SLAB_ACCOUNT
> 
> And changing the allocation to kmem_cache_alloc(dio_kmem_cache,
> GFP_KERNEL) should provide the same sort of performance improvement
> as this patch does.
> 
> Can you test this, please?

Hi Dave:
Sorry it took so long to respond. Guzebing was busy with something else, I did
this test.
I test sheaf_capacity on 7.0-rc3, it doesn't show any performance improvment.
Besides, I wrote a simple kernel modules to test the performance difference by
creating a normal memcache and one with sheaf_capacity and testing the time
consuming to request 32 objects and then free 32 objects. which resulted in a
roughly 10% improvement in time spent. 
I'm thinking that maybe these improvements may not be significant enough to
see the effect in the io flow.
Using a simple list seems to be the most efficient approach.

Thanks.
Fengnan.

> 
> If it doesn't provide any performance improvment, then I suspect
> that Vlastimil will be interested to find out why....
> 
> Also, if it does work, it is likely the bioset mempools (which are
> slab based) can be initialised similarly, removing the need for
> custom per-cpu free lists in the block layer, too.
> 
> -Dave.
> 
>
> > v3:
> > kmalloc now is called outside the get_cpu/put_cpu code section.
>
> > v2:
> > Factor percpu cache into common code and the iomap module uses it.
>
> > v1:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251121090052.384823-1-guzebing1612@xxxxxxxxx/
>
> > Tested-by: syzbot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > Suggested-by: Fengnan Chang <changfengnan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: guzebing <guzebing1612@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/iomap/direct-io.c | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 130 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> > diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> > index 5d5d63efbd57..4421e4ad3a8f 100644
> > --- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> > +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> > @@ -56,6 +56,130 @@ struct iomap_dio {
> >          };
> >  };
> >  
> > +#define PCPU_CACHE_IRQ_THRESHOLD        16
> > +#define PCPU_CACHE_ELEMENT_SIZE(pcpu_cache_list) \
> > +        (sizeof(struct pcpu_cache_element) + pcpu_cache_list->element_size)
> > +#define PCPU_CACHE_ELEMENT_GET_HEAD_FROM_PAYLOAD(payload) \
> > +        ((struct pcpu_cache_element *)((unsigned long)(payload) - \
> > +                                       sizeof(struct pcpu_cache_element)))
> > +#define PCPU_CACHE_ELEMENT_GET_PAYLOAD_FROM_HEAD(head) \
> > +        ((void *)((unsigned long)(head) + sizeof(struct pcpu_cache_element)))
> > +
> > +struct pcpu_cache_element {
> > +        struct pcpu_cache_element        *next;
> > +        char        payload[];
> > +};
> > +struct pcpu_cache {
> > +        struct pcpu_cache_element        *free_list;
> > +        struct pcpu_cache_element        *free_list_irq;
> > +        int                nr;
> > +        int                nr_irq;
> > +};
> > +struct pcpu_cache_list {
> > +        struct pcpu_cache __percpu *cache;
> > +        size_t element_size;
> > +        int max_nr;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct pcpu_cache_list *pcpu_cache_list_create(int max_nr, size_t size)
> > +{
> > +        struct pcpu_cache_list *pcpu_cache_list;
> > +
> > +        pcpu_cache_list = kmalloc(sizeof(struct pcpu_cache_list), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +        if (!pcpu_cache_list)
> > +                return NULL;
> > +
> > +        pcpu_cache_list->element_size = size;
> > +        pcpu_cache_list->max_nr = max_nr;
> > +        pcpu_cache_list->cache = alloc_percpu(struct pcpu_cache);
> > +        if (!pcpu_cache_list->cache) {
> > +                kfree(pcpu_cache_list);
> > +                return NULL;
> > +        }
> > +        return pcpu_cache_list;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void pcpu_cache_list_destroy(struct pcpu_cache_list *pcpu_cache_list)
> > +{
> > +        free_percpu(pcpu_cache_list->cache);
> > +        kfree(pcpu_cache_list);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void irq_cache_splice(struct pcpu_cache *cache)
> > +{
> > +        unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +        /* cache->free_list must be empty */
> > +        if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cache->free_list))
> > +                return;
> > +
> > +        local_irq_save(flags);
> > +        cache->free_list = cache->free_list_irq;
> > +        cache->free_list_irq = NULL;
> > +        cache->nr += cache->nr_irq;
> > +        cache->nr_irq = 0;
> > +        local_irq_restore(flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void *pcpu_cache_list_alloc(struct pcpu_cache_list *pcpu_cache_list)
> > +{
> > +        struct pcpu_cache *cache;
> > +        struct pcpu_cache_element *cache_element;
> > +
> > +        cache = per_cpu_ptr(pcpu_cache_list->cache, get_cpu());
> > +        if (!cache->free_list) {
> > +                if (READ_ONCE(cache->nr_irq) >= PCPU_CACHE_IRQ_THRESHOLD)
> > +                        irq_cache_splice(cache);
> > +                if (!cache->free_list) {
> > +                        put_cpu();
> > +                        cache_element = kmalloc(PCPU_CACHE_ELEMENT_SIZE(pcpu_cache_list),
> > +                                                                        GFP_KERNEL);
> > +                        if (!cache_element)
> > +                                return NULL;
> > +                        return PCPU_CACHE_ELEMENT_GET_PAYLOAD_FROM_HEAD(cache_element);
> > +                }
> > +        }
> > +
> > +        cache_element = cache->free_list;
> > +        cache->free_list = cache_element->next;
> > +        cache->nr--;
> > +        put_cpu();
> > +        return PCPU_CACHE_ELEMENT_GET_PAYLOAD_FROM_HEAD(cache_element);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void pcpu_cache_list_free(void *payload, struct pcpu_cache_list *pcpu_cache_list)
> > +{
> > +        struct pcpu_cache *cache;
> > +        struct pcpu_cache_element *cache_element;
> > +
> > +        cache_element = PCPU_CACHE_ELEMENT_GET_HEAD_FROM_PAYLOAD(payload);
> > +
> > +        cache = per_cpu_ptr(pcpu_cache_list->cache, get_cpu());
> > +        if (READ_ONCE(cache->nr_irq) + cache->nr >= pcpu_cache_list->max_nr)
> > +                goto out_free;
> > +
> > +        if (in_task()) {
> > +                cache_element->next = cache->free_list;
> > +                cache->free_list = cache_element;
> > +                cache->nr++;
> > +        } else if (in_hardirq()) {
> > +                lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> > +                cache_element->next = cache->free_list_irq;
> > +                cache->free_list_irq = cache_element;
> > +                cache->nr_irq++;
> > +        } else {
> > +                goto out_free;
> > +        }
> > +        put_cpu();
> > +        return;
> > +out_free:
> > +        put_cpu();
> > +        kfree(cache_element);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#define DIO_ALLOC_CACHE_MAX                256
> > +static struct pcpu_cache_list *dio_pcpu_cache_list;
> > +
> >  static struct bio *iomap_dio_alloc_bio(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
> >                  struct iomap_dio *dio, unsigned short nr_vecs, blk_opf_t opf)
> >  {
> > @@ -135,7 +259,7 @@ ssize_t iomap_dio_complete(struct iomap_dio *dio)
> >                          ret += dio->done_before;
> >          }
> >          trace_iomap_dio_complete(iocb, dio->error, ret);
> > -        kfree(dio);
> > +        pcpu_cache_list_free(dio, dio_pcpu_cache_list);
> >          return ret;
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_dio_complete);
> > @@ -620,7 +744,7 @@ __iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
> >          if (!iomi.len)
> >                  return NULL;
> >  
> > -        dio = kmalloc(sizeof(*dio), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +        dio = pcpu_cache_list_alloc(dio_pcpu_cache_list);
> >          if (!dio)
> >                  return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >  
> > @@ -804,7 +928,7 @@ __iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
> >          return dio;
> >  
> >  out_free_dio:
> > -        kfree(dio);
> > +        pcpu_cache_list_free(dio, dio_pcpu_cache_list);
> >          if (ret)
> >                  return ERR_PTR(ret);
> >          return NULL;
> > @@ -834,6 +958,9 @@ static int __init iomap_dio_init(void)
> >          if (!zero_page)
> >                  return -ENOMEM;
> >  
> > +        dio_pcpu_cache_list = pcpu_cache_list_create(DIO_ALLOC_CACHE_MAX, sizeof(struct iomap_dio));
> > +        if (!dio_pcpu_cache_list)
> > +                return -ENOMEM;
> >          return 0;
> >  }
> >  fs_initcall(iomap_dio_init);
> > -- 
> > 2.20.1
>
>
>
> 
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>