Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] [RFC PATCH 0/4] mm/mempolicy: introduce socket-aware weighted interleave

[Rakie Kim]

On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 10:01:48 -0400 Gregory Price <gourry@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 02:12:48PM +0900, Rakie Kim wrote:
> > This patch series is an RFC to propose and discuss the overall design
> > and concept of a socket-aware weighted interleave mechanism. As there
> > are areas requiring further refinement, the primary goal at this stage
> > is to gather feedback on the architectural approach rather than focusing
> > on fine-grained implementation details.
> > 
> 
> I gave this a brief browse this morning, and I rather like this
> approach, more-so than the original proposals for socket-awareness
> that encoded the weights in a 2-dimensional array.

Hello Gregory,

Thanks for your review and feedback. I also think this approach is
much better than the previous 2-dimensional array idea. Since this
is still an early draft, I hope this code will be developed into a
better design through community discussions.

> 
> I think this would be a great discussion at LSF, and I wonder if
> something like memory-package could be used for more purposes than just
> weighted interleave.
> 
> ~Gregory

I and Honggyu Kim are actually preparing to propose this exact topic
for the upcoming LSF/MM/BPF summit. However, I accidentally missed
adding lsf-pc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx to the CC list. I will
re-post or forward this to the LSF PC list soon.

You are exactly right about the memory-package. When I first designed
it, I wanted to use it for memory tiering and other areas, not just
for weighted interleave. For now, weighted interleave is the only
implemented use case, but I hope to keep improving it so it can be
used in other subsystems as well.

Thanks again for your time and review.

Rakie Kim