Re: [PATCH 00/15] tracepoint: Avoid double static_branch evaluation at guarded call sites

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 13 Mar 2026 10:02:32 -0400
Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vineeth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >
> > Perhaps: call_trace_foo() ?
> >  
> call_trace_foo has one collision with the tracepoint
> sched_update_nr_running and a function
> call_trace_sched_update_nr_running. I had considered this and later
> moved to trace_invoke_foo() because of the collision. But I can rename
> call_trace_sched_update_nr_running to something else if call_trace_foo
> is the general consensus.

OK, then lets go with: trace_call__foo()

The double underscore should prevent any name collisions.

Does anyone have an objections?

-- Steve